Author Archives: Krisztian Fekete

About Krisztian Fekete

Tech support engineer and Jack of all trades at Vamsoft. Knows regular expressions and isn’t afraid to use them. Takes active part in the nightlife of Budapest. Occasionally stars as an extra in commercials and movies, just for the fun of it. Find me on LinkedIn

ORDB started to block everything

Despite the fact the Open Relay Database (ORDB) DNS Blacklist was shut down in December 2006 and operates no longer (DNS queries timed out since then), a large number of mail server administrators forgot to remove the ORDB definition from their filtering softwares (including ORF).

It seems the guys at ORDB finally had enough of the large number of queries to their servers and decided to return 127.0.0.2 responses to all queries instead of no answers (timeout). This means if you have ORDB enabled, it will blacklist all non-whitelisted mails… So it is strongly suggested to review your configuration to avoid such issues. (If you still have ORDB enabled in Configuration / Tests / DNS Blacklists, remove it immediately).

Quite aggressive measure from their part, but quite effective (and understandable if you ask me).

Skype Support Experiences

A few weeks ago, we decided to test whether providing support via Skype would be a more popular (and suitable) way to contact us regarding ORF problems than our regular support lines (phone, email and our newsgroups). So I started to look for a good headset for this purpose, but surprisingly, neither of the manufacturers keep in mind that somebody will wear this thing for 8 hours straight… I read a hundred reviews but all headsets have this common problem: even the most expensive models are very uncomfortable to wear. OK, their sound is loud, clear and cool, but I do not really care if my skull is in a clamp for hours. I prefer large earpieces which are large enough to cover my (also large) ears on my large head. Maybe I am not part of the target audience, but even large headed people should use Skype sometimes :) (note to self: market gap)

Finally, we decided to buy a Sennheiser PC 135 USB headset. It has all the problems I mentioned above, but it will do.

The next step was creating a Skype account for the support calls and indicate our status on our website. It was easy to setup by following the steps described in the Skype FAQ. The final result was a link, which should indicate our status, but it does not: it shows me online even if I am offline. Great!

But at least our users could give us a call or chat with us about ORF problems, and we thought it would be a good thing none the less. So we waited for the first call and… in a couple of hours later, we solved the first problem via Skype, and some others later. Most of the callers preferred chat instead of talking, which is good, considering my terrible Hungarian accent. A couple of days later I started to see some weird things: Skype notified me about unanswered calls (from the US) from 4 days before. Why didn’t it notified me on the day after the calls took place? I have no idea… We solved these problems via email by the time Skype notified me, so it does not really matter, but still: it does not work the way it should.

As our company is located in Budapest (Hungary), at least the Skype calls are cheaper than calling us from the other side of the globe, but it cannot provide a solution for the timezone differences: if an ORF-user calls us when nobody is in the office, it doesn’t matter how he calls us… Additionally, we did not receive more calls via Skype then via phone, so it seems that the price of the call is not really a deciding factor.

Peter in the background

I think we will keep this channel open for our users, as even the low number of calls worth it if the result is a satisfied customer. (Oh, it sounds so cheap, but that’s the way it is :))

Internet is a series of…tubes?!

I always get upset when somebody tries to squeeze more money out of something that was free since it was created: recently, several network operators decided to kill the Network Neutrality over the Internet, as (I assume) they cannot raise their annual profit enough under the current circumstances. So, they want to charge Internet content providers for enhanced IP services (and the content provider will shift the cost to the consumer of course).

But what is Network Neutrality anyway? “Network neutrality is the principle that Internet users should be in control of what content they view and what applications they use on the Internet. Fundamentally, net neutrality is about equal access to the Internet. Just as telephone companies are not permitted to tell consumers who they can call or what they can say, broadband carriers should not be allowed to use their market power to control activity online. Today, the neutrality of the Internet is at stake as the broadband carriers want Congress’s permission to determine what content gets to you first and fastest. Put simply, this would fundamentally alter the openness of the Internet.” (from Google)

So, long story short: if they succeed, the websites of smaller companies and nonprofit organizations, blogs etc. would move slower through the wire, as they do not have money to make the data „valuable” enough… But if your company can afford it, your site would get to the user as fast as lightning.

Finally, they were not be able to push the amendment through the legislature, but I think it was not the last time we heard about this… (Same happened to the software patent-case: they tried to push it through over and over again).

I believe that a very minimal regulation is needed over the Internet, (as they say it is for regulation to “shake out” illegal contents) but not this way. Just think about it: could we really stop spam for example by charging the sender for every mail? The legal users should pay, but will the spammers? I don’t think so. (That’s another story for another time :)

Some links if you want to know more about Net Neutrality:

Wikipedia – Net Neutrality
Save the Internet
News.com – Net Neutrality Showdown
News.com – Without ‘Net neutrality,’ will consumers pay twice?

And some funny stuff:

Daily Show with John Stewart on Net Neutrality
The Daily Show revisits Net Neutrality