OK. NO TCO OR ROI HERE. WE LIED.
Posted on March 9th, 2010 by Peter |
Permalink
I just came across an elegant alternative to our Self-Spam Agent (which stops spam sent in your name) in Alan Hardisty’s blog. While Alan’s solution takes at least Exchange 2007 and the Self-Spam agent will support Exchange 2000 and newer + IIS SMTP, it is a beautiful demonstration of what Exchange 2007 can do for you.
Posted on March 8th, 2010 by asudy |
Permalink
The ORF team will make an appearance at the annual Infosecurity exhibition in Brussels at the end of March. The event will be at the Brussels Expo on 24-25 March in Hall 8.
We will be going around the floor all day, so if you want to meet us in person send us an email (orf@vamsoft.com), we will be around on both days.
Posted on March 5th, 2010 by Peter |
Permalink
It has been a while since I last compiled our own ORF statistics using the Reporting Tool and what I am seeing is that SURBLs are taking over DNS Blacklists.
Is it just us, or are SURBLs really taking over? You can check your statistics in the Test / Summary section of any ORF report created with the ORF Reporting Tool.
UPDATE: Actually, there’s an explanation for this. Recently we switched to all-On Arrival filtering on our server and that means SURBLs are tested earlier than DNSBLs (see General Information / Test Order and Priority in the ORF Help), hence the more emphasized role for SURBLs.
That does not change the fact that SURBLs alone do a great job. ORF cleans up the the traffic step by step and 30% of what’s reaching SURBLs is cleaned up by them, leaving behind a much more legitimate traffic for DNSBLs, which cleans up another 8%.
Posted on March 1st, 2010 by Krisztian |
Permalink
Microsoft introduced the Edge and Hub roles in Exchange 2007. The idea was to separate the perimeter (gateway) functions in order to perform filtering before the email reaches the central server. This includes recipient validation, i.e. to reject all emails sent to non-existent recipients. This is performed by an Exchange transport agent called the “Recipient Filter Agent”.
The Active Directory-based Recipient Validation of ORF is not available on Edge servers, because the Edge server do not have direct access to the AD, so ORF cannot query the valid recipients. This would not be a problem, (since Edge will reject emails sent to non-existent recipients anyway), but the Directory Harvest Attack (DHA) Protection test of ORF relies on the recipient validation of ORF, so that test will not be available on Edge (unless you use TXT or SQL-based recipient validation).
Moreover, as the Honeypot test relies on spam emails sent to non-existent email addresses (which you published to lure spammers), that won’t work either, because Edge will reject spam before ORF could record the delivery attempt to the Honeypot database.
Luckily, we can work the latter problem around by configuring the Trasport Agent of ORF to run before the Recipient Filter Agent:
1) Start the Exchange Management Shell
2) Enter the following command:
Get-TransportAgent | Format-List
3) ORF has two agents, the “Vamsoft ORF Routing Agent” and the “Vamsoft ORF Receive Agent”. You should set their priority of the latter higher than the priority of the “Recipient Filter Agent”, so it would run first.
To change the priority (e.g. to 7), run the following command:
Set-TransportAgent -Identity “Vamsoft ORF Receive Agent” -Priority 7
4) Finally, restart the MSExchangeTransport Service to apply the changes:
Restart-Service MSExchangeTransport
This way, the Honeypot test is performed before the email is rejected by the recipient validation of Edge.
Posted on February 18th, 2010 by Krisztian |
Permalink
We have received many reports that opening the installer executable of the trial or registered version of ORF fails with the following error message:
“Windows cannot access the specified device, path, or file. You may not have the appropriate permission to access the item.”
This error is shown even if you downloaded and try to run the installer as an Administrator, and you have full control over the file and the folder it resides in.
This is caused by a default Windows security feature (or rather: annoyance) to prevent EXE files from running before you Unblock them (huh?)
To fix this, do the following:
1. Right-click the file in Windows Explorer, select Properties
2. On the General tab, click the Unblock button
Now you can proceed with the installation.
Posted on February 15th, 2010 by Peter |
Permalink
ORF 4.4 is a minor update with mostly compatibility updates: both Windows Server 2008 and 2008 R2 IIS SMTP-only installations are now supported and also the Exchange 2010 support no longer requires a patch. For the complete list of changes, check the ORF Change Log.
You can download the new version from the Customers Area (or if you are using the trial, you can switch to 4.4 using the trial installer.
Posted on February 3rd, 2010 by Peter |
Permalink
Do you have a secondary MX? If so, we are happy to save you a few bucks today.
How? Well, here is some food for thought! Let’s see a few disadvantages of running a backup MX.
-
It costs money. More often than not spam and virus protection will cost you extra for your secondary MX.
-
They are spam magnets. Spammers love going straight to your secondary MX, even when primary is up. And when that happens…
- …you will backscatter. Secondary MXs are typically lame relays that happily swallow emails for non-existent recipients. When your primary MX refuses to accept the undeliverable email, the secondary MX will send an NDR to the original and obviously fake sender. At very least you will be NDR-bombing innocent people, or end up on backscatterer.org.
Be a good netizen, do not backscatter.
Of course, secondary MXs have benefits as well, such us… well, nothing I can think of.
Backup MXs were invented to accept and queue email when your primary MX is down. So if you do not have a backup MX, you will lose email when the primary goes down, right? Well, not quite. Most modern MTAs will recognize your only MX is down and will queue the emails for a few days. What you really gain by a secondary MX is the ability to set your own queue timeout. If it takes a week to fix your primary MX, you surely can make good use of the redundancy.
Is it worth it? Only your situtation justifies it. If you do not find a reasonable excuse, though, drop your secondary MX. Or, buy another copy of ORF for the backup server. We love that option as well :)
Posted on January 27th, 2010 by Krisztian |
Permalink
The current trial version of ORF (4.3) supports Exchange 2010 after installing a patch, but you may receive an error if you try to install the registered build on top of this patched trial version. That is because the installer of 4.3 registered does not incorporate the Exchange 2010 patch by default.
To solve this problem, you should simply ignore the installation error during the conversion process, install the patch again for the registered build, then issue the following command in the ORF installation directory:
orfainst -install
This will be addressed by the upcoming 4.4 version, which includes the patch by default.
Posted on January 21st, 2010 by Krisztian |
Permalink
Good news for people who want to use ORF on Windows Server 2008 or 2008 R2 with IIS SMTP (without Exchange): the wait will soon be over :)
We decided to release a new version before ORF 5 (which is expected to be released within a few months).
This interim release will incorporate the following improvements compared to 4.3:
- Support for Exchange 2010 by default (no patch is required)
- Support for IIS SMTP on Windows Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2
- Some bugfixes
The new version will be available within two weeks for everyone with a valid Software Maintenance Agreement.
Posted on January 11th, 2010 by Krisztian |
Permalink
Lately, we have received many inquiries regarding the filtering of display names in emails. The display name in your email client (e.g. Outlook) is actually the From: field of the MIME email header. The MIME headers can be retrieved by selecting View | Options in Outlook (”Internet Headers”). To check the MIME headers in other clients, please visit this page). Example:
[...]
From: “VIAGRA \(c\) Best Supplier” (email@address)
[...]
You can filter this MIME From: field using the Keyword Blacklist of ORF:
1. Download the filter expression by right-clicking this link and selecting “Save link as…” (XML file)
1. Start the ORF Administration Tool
2. Expand Configuration / Tests / Tests in the left navigation tree and make sure the Keyword Blacklist test is enabled
3. Select Configuration | Import | Keyword blacklist… from the main menu, or navigate to Configuration / Filtering – On Arrival / Keyword Blacklist, right-click in the expressions box and select “Import list…”
4. Select the XML file you downloaded and click Open
5. If you already have some expressions in the list, you will be prompted “Do you want to overwrite…?”. Click “No” (otherwise your current expressions will be wiped out)
6. Press Ctrl + S to save and apply the configuration changes (pre-4.3 users should press Ctrl + U)
And that’s it: the expression above will block any emails, which have “Viagra” in their MIME From: email header line.
However, I should point out that we suggest relying on automated tests of ORF (like DNS and URL blacklists) as much as possible instead of adding keyword filtering expressions every time you receive a new type of spam (and instead of adding the sender to the Sender or IP Blacklists), so you should probably read our best practices guide regarding the recommended configuration if you have received such spam we mentioned above (”viagra” in the display name).
Our own ORF instance at Vamsoft (which is configured according to the guide) caught all of these using automated tests ;)
UPDATE: some of you guys reported that the regex doesn’t work: that’s because the expression above is altered by our blog engine, Wordpress (it replaces the double quote characters with left double quotation marks). To work this around, download this XML file from the link and import it to your Keyword Blacklist.